can some 'ceo' in the world (of course who is not begging for tax payer bailout money) clarify the below statement of one of their buddies.

Stating that there was a need to strike a balance between development and environment...

when we hit tribals in niyamgiri with forced eviction is that a 'balance'?
when we hit several lakhs of tribals on fake eia in narmada dam project is that a 'balance'?
when we brutalize farmers in name of SEZ, is that a 'balance'?
when we rape million year old ecosytems like athirapally, is that a 'balance'?
when we pollute all our mother rivers so easily, is that a 'balance'?
when we have not still given proper compensation for world's biggest industrial disaster in bhopal, is that a 'balance'?

or is the ceo saying Stating that there was a need to strike a balance between balance sheets and environment...

perhaps our ceo's need more bailout money and then perhaps they will talk sensibly!!!